DigiLit Sunday: Digital vs. Non-Digital? It depends…

Margaret Simon put out a call, a proposition for her DigiLit link up: Digital versus Non-Digital?  


Like all things in teaching and most things in life, there is not one answer. Thank you, Margaret, for putting out the call to share our experiences around this ever-changing proposition. From what I can see after four years of teaching, reading and writing in digital environments, I’d have to say, that what works best all depends. 

It depends on the person. There are a fair number of students who process better in a digital environment. A keyboard is a place their fingers move readily. The pen is their enemy. Those students who have difficulty forming letters can show their thinking when given a device. It could be the pure physicality of it, but I suspect it also is an enormous benefit of seeing your words appear in a clear context.   

Some students who process best on paper. I was one of those people for a long time. I could not think on a keyboard. Now, the majority of my writing is done in a digital space. For students with limited access to technology, and relative success with paper and pen, when given a choice, they choose paper.

It depends on the task Digital tools are just that, a tool. They provide an access point for communication. 

To make the best choice, I ask my students (and myself) three questions.

  1. What is my purpose/desired outcome?
  2. Where do I do my best work?
  3. How much time do I have?

Recently, my students had to do a research project on a topic of their choice. How to go about their research and writing depended on the answers to those questions. And it changed throughout their project.

It depends on aesthetics. For myself, I’ve seen aesthetics play a large role. As a teen, I loved paperback books. Hardcover books were not comfortable in my hands. My first Kindle device took some getting used to, and I disliked it for anything that required my full attention; it seemed less satisfying.  I wanted to touch pages, feel the weight of a book in my hands. See how many pages I had gotten through, had to go. But when I did not have a book in my bag, I had my phone. And slowly, electronic reading became a habit of convenience, and I let go of my old ideas of what reading should feel like. This summer I returned to the pleasure in paper bound books. I read blogs and news digitally. The immediacy and visuals often connected to this type of literature seem best fitted for digital consumption. But books and bookmarks are back in my life, and it feels good.

Some students, report digital reading is easier. Their eyes to run down a page at a quicker rate. Students love digital spaces they can access quickly and can understand readily. In these cases, digital reading results in a higher “joy” factor.

Bottom line in my view: It is vital that we provide digital opportunities alongside book-filled libraries, notebooks, stacks of paper and vibrant pens and pencils because it all depends.

2014-05-30 12.03.38

3 thoughts on “DigiLit Sunday: Digital vs. Non-Digital? It depends…

  1. Julieanne, as literacy geeks I think we all love the feel of books as you mentioned. Bookmarks come in all shapes and sizes so they are almost trinket like jewels that fill book pages (warming our hearts). Paper and pens have always been my go-to tools, even now when I fill my digital notebooks with compositions and thoughts. Are we in between two worlds. If so, I like it here. Thanks for making me think about students’ world and what fills their literacy spaces. I love this thought of yours: “digital reading results in a higher “joy” factor”. Children definitely need joy in their lives.

  2. I see similarities in our ideas. Yes, it all depends on the user. I think for some, digital is a great option. I’ve had many gifted boys (this is particular to boys) who struggle with handwriting. When given the chance to compose on the computer, they are much more adept and will write longer, more meaningful pieces because they don’t have to go through the painful step of writing. I worry about these kids on the paper pencil test. And yet, I also worry about the ones who cannot type quickly. They are so preoccupied with finding the letter on the keyboard that no clear thoughts come through. Depends! Thanks for writing today. And thanks for the topic ideas. I think they will keep us going for a few weeks.

    • I have those boys! In my district we test on computers. Last year all students reported a much lower level of fatigue because they didn’t have to write with a pencil.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s